Fectio
Index






|
|

click here
|
The Draco,
the Late Roman military standardBy Robert Vermaat
|
Origins:
Sarmatians, Alans, Parthians and Persians:
The draco Standard was
originally developed by the cavalry peoples of the
steppes, such as the Sarmatians and the Alans, but also
by the Parthians and the Sassanid Persians. It may have
been used primarily to determine the wind-direction for
the horse archers. Arrian described it as a long sleeve, 'made
by sewing pieces of dyed material together'. This
sleeve/tube hung limp when the rider was at rest, but on
the move it flew like a serpent and whistled in
the wind. The hollow head, in the form of a toothed
dragon, was formed from metal and the wind passing
through it would extend the cloth tube tail attached to
the neck of the head. The draco was also used by the
Dacians (or their allies) and no less than 20 of these
are shown on Trajan's Column. Other sources mention
Parthian and Sassanid Persian dracos.
Not all such standards had dragon heads. The one below on
the left from Trajan's Column shows the tubular tail with
streamers attached. The head looks more like a dog (with
ears) than a dragon. The one beside it has a much more
serpentine head, and has scalloped rings attached to the
tail. Other standards had no heads at all, just the
fabric tube, while some had heads looking like wolves or
even fishes. These had protruding ears and fins. The
images below show part of the Arch of Galerius with
several dracos.

A draco from Trajan's Column. |

Another draco from Trajan's Column. |

Several dracos on the Arch of Galerius (311AD),
carried by infantry as well as cavalry. |

4-5th-c. Coptic wall painting from Kharga Oasis,
Egypt, showing Sassanid dracos. |

Fectio's reconstruction of what such a
fabric draco may have looked like. |
Sassanid
Persian dracos main have been made of fabric only. From
the Historia Augusta we learn that when Aurelianus had
reconquered Palmyra (272 AD), amongst the treasure were 'Persian
dragon-flags' (Persici dracones)[1], which to me sounds like the
standards we're discussing here. What these draco may
have looked like we can see below; on the extreme right
is a 5th c. AD Coptic wall painting, showing the
occupying Sassanid Persian forces carrying two dracos.
The Roman draco
The Draco was adopted
first into the Roman cavalry during the 2nd century AD,
possibly with the introduction of Sarmatian cavalry into
the Roman army. Arrian, who was writing c. 137 AD,
described it as a Scythian (he most probably
meant Sarmatian) invention which was adopted by Roman
cavalry[2]. The Romans first began to use the draco
in cavalry games, the so-called 'Hippica Gymnasia'.
These were described by Arrian as glamorised
versions of training exercises, performed in decorated
armour. It is possible that the draco was introduced just
because it was 'outlandish', foreign and glamourous.
Points in the game were scored for strikes on the tail
piece of the dracos carried by a team acting as 'targets',
from dummy javelins thrown by another team of riders.
Arrian recommended that the standard be colorful, adding
to to the spectacle of cavalry parades. One should be
given to each unit to maintain order in both displays and
battle. The Roman cavalry adopted the draco probably
during or after the Dacian wars, in which the equipment
of the Roman cavalry was altere to withstand the charged
of the lance-armed cavalry. These equipment changes
included the adoption of the fully-armed cavalry (alae
cataphractiorum) and the long lance. It would be
logical to assume that this was the time when also the
draco standard was introduced.
The choice for the
dragon/serpent as model is not so easy to explain,
because the steppe cultures used other animal's heads and
continued to do so. However, it has been assumed that it
was because of the Thracian dominance in Roman cavalry
that the latter adopted the serpent shape. These Thracian
horsemen had a deity which resembled a 'flying' serpent
with scales, teeth and an upstanding crest, which may
well have been a draco or something similar.
It is not documented
when exactly the draco was adopted as a normal standard
for all troop types. However, sources mention the draco
being used with the infantry. The Historia Augusta
mentions that the mother of Severus (193-211 AD) dreamt
of a puple snake before his birth, something very alike
what we later hear of the Imperial standard[3]. But since this source was probably
compiled later, we can't be sure this has any bearing on
a dating. We are on more solid ground with the entry of
the reign of Gallienus (253-268 AD), when legionary
troops are said to have paraded with a dracon amongst the
standards of the legions[4] and the troops of
Aurelianus (270-5 AD) also had draconarii
amongst the standard-bearers[5]. This may lead us to conclude that the
infantry began using dracos during the late 3rd c. On the
Arch of Galerius, which was built before 311 AD to
commemorate Galerius' war against Persia in 290 AD,
several dracos can be seen to his left and right, carried
by infantry as well as cavalry (see the image above, 2nd
from right).
We have no good idea
about the general appearance of the draco. Some draco
heads may have looked like a draco, but some seem to look
more like wolves or dogs, or even of an ass (..).
 |
|
Also, we can't be sure of
the lenght of the windsock, or the actual length
of the pole on which it was carried. However, the coins of the
Emperor Trajan Decius (AD 249-251) give us some
idea as to tall the latter was. If not a
representation of a boar-headed trumpet (carnycus),
it does not seem to have been taller than a man.
In my opinion though, the Emperor would rather be
shown with an standard.
|
 |
The draco head was most probably
constructed by first carving a wooden original, then
beating a copper alloy sheet around it. This draco head
was made of two halves, the bottom jaw being riveted
against the top half. Adding a windsock may be a problem,
because we have no clear idea how long it would be.
However, trial and error will get you there, with of
course different lengths and materials possible. I'd go
for silk, which may be expensive, but it is light and
gets the best result. Possibly, added hoops might keep
the tail 'inflated', which can also be used to attach
strips of cloth to create the 'streaming' effect of the
flying beast described by Arrian (Ars. Tact. 35.3-4).
The images below show a 2nd-3rd C. funeral stele from
Chester, probably showing a Sarmatian draconarius.

The funeral stele from Chester.
|

Reconstruction of the stele from Chester.
|

Reconstruction drawing by Gerry Embleton, showing
a Sarmatian in Roman service, based on the
Chester stele as well as the 'dog' draco from
Trajans Column.
|

Anoter view of the Niederbieber original.
|
The Niederbieber draco
The Roman draco
developed into a real dragon, without ears but with
scales and a crest. The only fully preserved draco was
found in the Limes fortress of Niederbieber in Germany,
which dates to the 3rd century. This copper alloy object
was discovered near the SW edge of the vicus (civilian
settlement) outside the fort. It can best be described as
a scaled monster's head, measuring 30x12x12 cm, and with
some probability is the head of a cohort's draco.
It is formed by the joining of two embossed sheets, the
gilded upper one overlapping the lower tinned one, both
attached by 5 rivets on each side. At the base of the
neck the sheets form a circular flange, riveted together
by 2 more rivets. Overlapping scales cover the head and
neck, while a series of ridges covers the upper jaw from
the nostrils to the eyes, which face sideways. The open
mouth shows triangular teeth, but no fangs or canines. A
crenellated crest is attached to the top of the head.
Two holes of similar size are pierced through both the
throat and the skull behind the crest. No doubt a staff
or the shaft of a spear would pass through here. Two
axial slits, 2 cm long, pierce the botom of the lower jaw,
probably to attach a lost mechanism that would have
produced the hissing effect.

The Draco found in Niederbieber, Germany. |

Reconstruction drawing by Eiden. The
head is about 30 cm long, 12cm high (with comb 17
cm), and 12 cm wide. |

The Niederbieber draco. |

Another shot of these reconstructions in the
Mainz museum. |
The
draco in the Late Roman army
The late 4th c. author
Vegetius also mentions the draco as a common standard. He
seems to have been confused about the difference between
the old standards and the new dragons though, as he wrote
that apparently standard- and draco-bearers differ[6], but also that the
standardbearers 'are now named dragonbearers[7], that both are present in a camp[8], but also that each cohort has a
draco[9]. if correct it would mean the first
overall standard for the cohort (where before none had
existed between the legionary aquila and the signa
of the centuries). the draco may have foreshadowed the
later common practise in the 3rd century to permanently
detach cohortes from their parent legions.
By 357 AD, the Emperors
Constantius and Julian (who was crowned by a draconarius[10]) had personal dracos sewn from a purple
material. Ammianus Marcellinus writes of flags as well as
draco being purple[11] and mentions them making a hissing sound
in the wind[12]. The Emperor's personal draco standards
made them identifyable in the heat of battle and may
therefore have been mainly a tactital instrument rather
than a personal adornment. Julian's draco at the battle
of Argentorate (357) was important in his attempt to
regain control of the battle. The early 5th/c. author
Zosimus also mentions Julian being extremely cross when
one was lost to the enemy during the Persian campaign[13] .
By the fifth century, as may be deduced from inscriptions
from Perge and Prusias/Üskübü, Turkey, as
well as a poem by Prudentius, there was a rank called magister
draconum. This officer was the superior of the draconarii
in a unit, ranking immediately below the tribune. However,
we don't know if he directed the draconarii in
battle, or may just have been the head of the standard
bearers' club or scholae. The magister
draconum probably replaced the optio
signiferorum, whose function unfortunately is
equally vague. Other ranks are less clear: from Cagliari/Sardinia
we know an optio draconarius, while the bearcus
draconarius seems to have been an unusually high-ranking
draconarius.
Prudentius also tells us that Late Roman draconarii
wore golden torcs as reward for their valor in battle.
However, we learn from Ammianus that the torc may have
been a badge of office, so possibly standard bearers were
selected from those who had earlier received such torcs,
marking them for an elite.
Below are some modern
reconstructions of the Niederbieber draco:

The reconstruction from Marcus Junkelmann.
A reconstruction for the Carnuntum Archaeological
Park. |

Another shot of the Carnuntum draco.

A draco from Joe Piela. |

The reconstruction by Michael Simkins.
Another shot of the reconstruction by Michael
Simkins. |

The Britannia draco.

Close-up of the Votadini draco. |

The Foederati draco,
reconstructed by Toni Feldon. |
The
Byzantine draconarius
The military manual
called the Strategikon of the emperor Maurikios
(582-602 AD) shows that draconarii were probably
still around in the 6th. century. However, it is not
clear whether the draconarius mentioned there[14] was already anachronistic or if he still
had a proper military function - there was a scholae
draconariorum, a non-military office staff of 10
clercs attached to a civilian praefectus praetorio.
After the 6th century, the draconarius
disappeared from the Byzantine army.

Reconstruction drawing by Angus McBride, showing
a Parthian 'fish'. |

Reconstruction drawing by Peter Conolly, showing
the Hippica Gymnasia described by Arrian. |

Reconstruction drawing by Angus McBride, after
the Villa Maria catacomb fresco. |

Reconstruction drawing by Richard Hook, with
windsock. |
After
the Romans
Dracos continued in use
in the Caucasus and Georgia, while in the West the Franks
under Charlemagne may have adopted them again. This may
show continuity, or else Charlemagne's attempts to
eminate the Roman Army. We have a miniature from the late
9th-c. Psalterium Aureum (MS St. Gall. Stift-Bib.
22, fol. 140, illustrating Psalm 59), which shows a draco
in a formation of heavy cavalry.
We also see it used
at the battle of Hastings in 1066 AD, where it is carried
by Harold Godwinson's retainer at the moment of his death.
The next image is from a 14th-century manuscript of L'Histoire
de Merlin by Robert de Boron, now in the
Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris. It shows King Arthur in
combat, brandishing what can only be a Medieval
representation of a Late Roman draco. This is not
supposed to reflect 14th-c. battle standards, but rather
a fanciful idea of ancient use.
The last image shows the flag of modern Wales, in Welsh
called Y Draig Goch (The Red Dragon). This red
dragon, as the tale goes, would go back to the myth of
the red and white dragons fighting on Vortigern's fort at
Dinas
Emrys
in Gwynedd, Wales. These dragons, though, are thought by
some to represent the draco of the Late Roman army.
The Dragon of Wessex, like the Red Dragon of Wales, may
indeed represent some form of continuity. However, it
could also show Francish influence in England and Wales
during the early Middle Ages, as well as an antiquity-related
Romanticism which has nothing to do with reality any more.
See
also:
Special thanks to Sander
van Dorst for providing the Greek quotes below:
Notes
[1] Scriptores Historiae Augustae,
Aurelianus 28.4:
| tunc illatae illae vestes,
quas in Templo Solis videmus, consertae gemmis,
tunc Persici dracones et tiarae,
tunc genus purpurae, quod postea nec ulla genus
detulit nec Romanus orbis vidit. |
Then were brought in
those garments, encrusted with jewels, which we
now see in the Temple of the Sun, then, too, the
Persian dragon-flags and head-dresses,
and a species of purple such as of nation ever
afterward offered or the Roman world beheld. |
[2] Arrianus, Tactica 35:
| ... Sèmeios de
diakerimenoi epelaunousin, ou tois Rhoomaikos
monon alla kai tois Skythikois, tou poikilooteran
te kai hama phoberooteran gignesthai tèn elasi.
Ta Skythika de sèmeia estin epi kontoon en
mèkei xymmetrooi drakontes apaiooroumenoi.
Poiountai de xyrraptoi ek rhakoon bebammenoon,
tas te kephalas kai to sooma pan este epi tas
ouras eikasmenoi ophesin, hoos phoberootata hoion
te eikasthènai. Kai ta sophismata tauta
atremountoon men toon hippoon ouden pleon è
rhakè an idois pepoikilmena es to katoo
apokremamena, elaunomenoon de empneomena
exonkountai, hooste hoos malista tois thèriois
epeoikenai, kai ti kai episyrizein pros tèn agan
kinèsin hypo tèi pnoèi biaiai dierchomenèi. |
'... They attack
separated by standards, not only the Roman but
the Scythian ones as well, so the charge becomes
more colourful and fearsome at the same time. The
Scythian standards are snakes of equal length
held up on top of spearshafts. They are made of
coloured pieces of cloth sewn together, the heads
and their entire body up to the tail resembling
serpents, so in order that they appear thus more
frightening. And when the horses are not
trembling from them the multicoloured bodies can
be seen hanging down, however when charging they
fill with air through the wind so they are most
like the beasts and even hiss when a strong wind
flows through much movement.' |
[3] Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Severus
4.1:
| ..mater eius pridie quam
pareret somniavit se purpureum dracunculum parere,
.. |
The night before he was
born his mother dreamed that she brought forth a
purple snake, .. |
[4] Scriptores Historiae Augustae,
Gallieni ii 8.6:
| Hastae auratae
altrinsecus quingenae, vexilla centena praeter ea,
quae collegiorum erant, dracones
et signa templorum omniumque legionum ibant. |
On each side of him were
borne five hundred gilded spears and one hundred
banners, besides those which belonged to the
corporations, and the flags of auxiliaries and
the statues from the sanctuaries and the standards
of all the legions. |
[5] Scriptores Historiae Augustae,
Aurelianus 31.7:
| Templum sane Solis,
quod apud Palmyram aquiliferi legionis tertiae
cum vexilliferis et draconario
et cornicinibus atque liticinibus diripuerunt, ad
eam formam volo, quae fuit, reddi. |
Now as to the Temple of
the Sun at Palmyra, which has been pillaged by
the eagle-bearers of the Third Legion, along with
the standard-bearers, the dragonbearer,
and the buglers and trumpeters, I wish there
is restored to the condition in which it formerly
was. |
[6] Vegetius, Epitoma rei militaris 1.20:
| ... Quid ipsi draconarii
atque signiferi, qui sinistra manu hastas
gubernant, in proelio facient, quorum et capita
nuda constant et pectora? ... |
... What are the dragonbearers
and standardbearers, which hold spears in their
left hand, to do in battle, whose heads and
breasts are naked ? ...' |
[7] ibidem 2.7:
| ... Signiferi qui
signa portant, quos nunc draconarios
vocant. ... |
'... Standardbearers who
carry the standards, whom they now call dragonbearers.
...' |
[8] ibidem 1.23:
| ... Porta autem, quae
appelatur praetoria, aut orientem spectare debet
aut illum locum, qui ad hostes respicit, aut, si
iter agitur, illam partem debet adtendere, ad
quam est profecturus exercitus, intra quam primae
centuriae, hoc est cohortes, papiliones tendunt
et dracones et
signa constitutum. ... |
'... The gate though,
which is called the commander's, must either face
east or to that spot, which faces towards the
enemies, or, if a march is conducted, must be
directed to that part, towards which the army is
to march out, at the inside of which the first
centuries, that is cohorts, set up tents and dragons
and standards are pitched. ...' |
[9] ibidem, 2.13:
| ...Dracones
etiam per singulas cohortes a draconariis
feruntur ad proelium ... |
'Dragons, one each for
the individual cohorts, are carried into battle
by dragonbearers.' |
[10] Ammianus Marcellinus, 20.4.18:
| ... torquem, quo ut
draconarius utebatur, capiti Iuliani imposuit ... |
'... and he placed the
torque, like the one used by a dragonbearer,
on the head of Iulianus ...' |
[11] ibidem,
15.5.16:
| ... cultu purpureo a draconum
et vexillorum insignibus ... |
'... by the purple
adornment from the signs of dragon
standards and flags ...' |
[12] ibidem, 16.10.7:
| ... purpureis
subtegminibus texti circumdedere dracones
hastarum aureis gemmatisque summitatibus inligati,
hiatu vasto perflabiles et ideo velut ira perciti
sibilantes caudarumque volumina relinquentes in
ventum. |
'... the dragons,
sewn from purple covers and placed on the gilded
and jewel-studded tips of spears, letting wind
through an enormous opening and in that way
hissing as if they had been aroused in anger and
the bodies of their tails flowing in the wind.' |
[13] Zosimus,
Historia Nova 3.19:
| |
Meanwhile Surenas,
advancing with a large army from a town in
Assyria, surprised the reconnoitring party in
advance of the army, killed one of the three
tribunes and some of his men, and put the
remainder to flight, carrying off a military
ensign which was in the form of a dragon, such as
the Romans usually carry in war. The emperor on
learning this was much displeased, and in his
anger attacked the forces of Surenas, compelled
all to fly that could escape, retook the ensign
which the enemy had carried off, and coming
immediately to the city where Surenas had
surprised the party, stormed, took, and burnt it.
As the commander of the party, preferring his own
safety to the valour and honour of a Roman, had
left his standard in the enemy's hands, he
deprived him of his girdle, regarding him as a
mean and worthless person, together with all who
had accompanied him in his flight |
[14] Maurikios,
Strategikon, 12.7:
| |
'There should be drill
masters, standard bearers or draconarii,
trumpeters, armorers, weapon makers, bowmakers,
arrow makers, and the rest according to
regulations.' |
Bibliography 
Sources
- Ammianus
Marcellinus:
the Later Roman Empire (AD 345-378), trans.
Walter Hamilton, notes by Andrew Wallace-Hadrill,
(Penguin Classics, London, 1986).
- Arrian: Tactica. Flavii Arriani
Quae Exstant Omnia, edited by A. G Ross. 2 vols.,
(Leipzig. B. G. Teubner, 1968).
- Historia Augusta, at: http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Historia_Augusta/home.html.
- Mauricos: Strategikon, Handbook
of Byzantine Military Strategy, trans. by George
T. Dennis, (Philadelphia 1984).
- Vegetius: Epitome of Military
Science, trans. N.P. Milner, translated texts for
historians vol. 16. (Liverpool 2001).
- Zosimus: Historia Nova, ed. and
trans by Buchanan, James J., and Davis, Harold T.,
(Trinity University press, San Antonio, Texas,
1967), pp. 249-58.
Secondary
literature
- Bishop, M.C. and J.C.N.
Coulston (1993):
Roman Military Equipment, from the Punic Wars to
the Fall of Rome (Batsford).
- Brzezinski, R. and
M. Mielczarek (2002): The Sarmatians, 600 BC-AD
450, Osprey Men-at-Arms 373, (Wellingsborough).
- Coulston, J.C.N. (1991): The 'draco'
standard, in: Journal of Roman Military
Equipment Studies 2, pp. 101-14.
- Fischer, Thomas (1999): Die Römer in
Deutschland, Theiss Verlag, Stuttgart.
- Junkelmann, Marcus (1990-2): Die Reiter Roms,
3 vols., (Mainz).
- Macdowall, Simon
and Howard Gerrard (ill.) (2001): Adrianople 378 AD,
Campaign 84, (Osprey, London).
- Nicolle, David and
Angus McBride
(ill.) (1996): Sassanian armies, The Iranian
Empire, early 3rd to mid-7th centuries AD, (Montvert,
Stockport).
- Oelwein, Cornelia (1998): Römer in
Deutschland, (HB Bildatlas 20).
- Shadrake, Dan,
Susanna and Richard Hook (ill.) (1997): Barbarian Warriors,
Saxons, Vikings, Normans, Brassey's History of
Uniforms 7, (Brassey's, London).
- Speidel, M.P. (1985): The Master of the
Dragon Standards and the Golden Torc: an
Inscription from Prusias and Prudentius'
Peristephanon, in: Transactions of the
American Philological Association 115, pp 290-5.
- Sumner, Graham and
Graham Turner
(ill.) (1997): Roman Army, Wars of the Empire, Brassey's
History of Uniforms 8, (Brassey's, London).
On the internet
|